Comments on: RDS socket API http://www.zabbo.net/post/rds-socket-api/ software princess Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:55:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Randy MacLeod http://www.zabbo.net/post/rds-socket-api/#comment-17082 Randy MacLeod Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:00:25 +0000 http://www.zabbo.net/post/rds-socket-api/#comment-17082 Have you looked at TIPC (tipc.sf.net). I is similar except that it isn't IP based (could be) and the reliablility is per destination node nor per dest socket. It has support for connection less and connection oriented sockets, multicast, interesting options on process failure, and a node to node link heartbeat. I'd be interested to hear what you think of it. Have you looked at TIPC (tipc.sf.net). I is similar except that it isn’t IP based (could be) and the reliablility is per destination node nor per dest socket.
It has support for connection less and connection oriented sockets, multicast, interesting options on process failure, and a node to node link heartbeat.

I’d be interested to hear what you think of it.

]]> By: anonymous http://www.zabbo.net/post/rds-socket-api/#comment-16806 anonymous Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:03:40 +0000 http://www.zabbo.net/post/rds-socket-api/#comment-16806 Why did RDS need to be in the kernel? Since you can only bind an RDS socket once per address, it seems there has to be a user-space message concentrator anyway. Also, have you seen Tibco's rudp? (Reliable UDP). Why did RDS need to be in the kernel? Since you can only bind an RDS socket once per address, it seems there has to be a user-space message concentrator anyway.

Also, have you seen Tibco’s rudp? (Reliable UDP).

]]>